Online tutoring has gained its popularity in recent years because of its convenience and effectiveness if we compare the traditional tutoring methods with it. Because of the inclusion of Modern technology, an entirely new format for tutoring and education has been created in general, but still, if we go through the recent surveys, it shows that parents may prefer in-person tutors to online. This theory might get changed because the tutoring industry has been growing at 5% per year and some fundamental changes are being incorporated in this sector.
Below are the details that highlight many differences between online and traditional tutoring:
Online Tutoring is Primarily Convenient
The first thing that sets online tutoring apart is, the convenience of online tutors it can’t be beaten. The tutors are available at any time, they can adjust the work around your schedule, and there is no time limit, the assignments can be completed when the time is right for you. And the plus point is, you can find all kinds of tutors from across the globe, and you can choose to learn about any topic you can possibly imagine, the idea is limitless.
There are personal notions of the children in which some of the children might feel more comfortable learning digitally rather than having someone commanding face-to-face. Online tutoring anyway helps the child to get connected by the Internet, it helps them developing basic typing, online networking, communication, and research skills.
And if the side of online tutors is to be taken into account, they are capable of paying more attention because of no traveling time. Also, it is cheaper than traditional tutoring.
Traditional Tutoring is Live and In-Person
On the other hand, it would hardly be possible to have a substitute for the kind of personal, authentic relationship a child can develop with their tutor, during their course of studies. The personal motivational factor, keeping an eye during the tasks and sometimes above the board talks with the student to make him/her comfortable could surely make a very positive atmosphere which would eventually encourage the learning and could help in speedy progress. This ‘personal touch’ theory could never be possible in online tutoring and have this kind of relationship while the students interact only through a screen.
For less techy parents, traditional tutoring may also be easier to monitor, as the tutor would probably come to the house and he/she would have to sit with the child. This undoubtedly gives parents a very tangible experience, they can keep an eye on their kid and can see their child’s education in action, which is less likely possible with an online tutor.
The negative aspect of this teaching format is, a bad tutor could do unthinkable damage in person than an online tutor. Also, the routines and the lesson plans are most likely to be more rigid and are not inclusive, hardly developed for the average student, instead of being tailored to the individual.
Clearly, Online tutoring should not be an alternative to traditional education. Rather, it should be used to supplement and expand on the material learned with traditional methods.